Hill v. Hill, 1/9/14
April 20, 2017
Based on the evidence presented to the trial court, it could have reasonably concluded that the husband’s partnership interest had the lower value, as testified by the husband and his expert, and that commercial goodwill, if any, was inaccessible based on, among other things, the status of the loan that he had taken out to buy into the firm, but that the partnership interest might have value someday, in the post-divorce future. The property division was not unfair and unjust under Tex. Fam. Code Ann. ? 7.001 (2006). The appellate court affirmed the lower court’s ruling.
